Stopgap Surgical Face Mask (SFM)
This model has been superseded by Stopgap Surgical Face Mask revision B, which was designed to increase comfort. This version may still be used, but see the revision B link for improvements.
This item should only be manufactured in a current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) facility. If this is not manufactured in a cGMP facility under an appropriate quality management system, it should not be used in a clinical setting.
This mask should only be printed with Multi-Jet Fusion (MJF) or Selective Laser Scintering (SLS) technologies out of powder-bed nylon
*** See the Documentation tab for detailed information including the Instructions For Use, Manufacturing Instructions, Bill of Materials, and Test Report ***
This device has not been tested to assess the out-gassing limits of the material or their corresponding health effects.
*** Updates coming ***
We also hope to release at least one other size soon, and expand our filter and cleaning options. Please check this site frequently for updates.
SolidWorks files attached - see Download button
Bill of Materials added to Documentation tab
Manufacturing guidance updated added to Documentation tab
Small size added. Now both small and medium available.
******
The Stopgap Face Mask was created as an emergency action in effort to protect people by providing backup PPE options if the standard PPE has become unavailable. This device has not gone through the same regulatory approval process as standard PPE.
The Stopgap Face Mask consists of two main components (the mask body and the filter cover) and contains features for attaching two elastic straps and receiving a patch of filter material. It is recommended that the rectangular filter patch and elastic straps are disposed of after every use of this device. The remaining parts of the plastic mask can be disinfected using common disinfecting solutions or sterilized and reused.
Many people contributed to this project and we thank them for their dedication and support:
-
- Patrick Aubin (Veterans Health Administration)
- Jared Bliss (Veterans Health Administration)
- Brian Burkhardt (Veterans Health Administration)
- Stuart Fairhurst (Veterans Health Administration)
- Joseph Iaquinto (Veterans Health Administration)
- Eli Kaufman (Veterans Health Administration)
- Matt Kindig (Veterans Health Administration)
- William Ledoux (Veterans Health Administration)
- Steve Morin (Veterans Health Administration)
- William Nylander (Veterans Health Administration)
- Chris Richburg (Veterans Health Administration)
- Beth Ripley (Veterans Health Administration)
- Brian Strzelecki (Veterans Health Administration)
- Greg Voss (Veterans Health Administration)
- Matthew Di Prima (Food and Drug Administration)
- James Coburn (Food and Drug Administration)
- Anthony Anderson (University of Washington)
- Lynda Brady (University of Washington)
- Colleen Carroll (University of Washington)
- Alex Hotz (University of Washington)
- Mark Ganter (University of Washington)
- Ian Good (University of Washington)
- Liang He (University of Washington)
- Dalton Hildreth (University of Washington)
- Yuri Hudak (University of Washington)
- William Lack (University of Washington)
- Jing-Sheng Li (University of Washington)
- Dmitry Levin (University of Washington)
- Jeffrey Lipton (University of Washington)
- Kelly Mack (University of Washington)
- Jen Mankoff (University of Washington)
- Connor Mulcahy (University of Washington)
- Alshakim Nelson PHD (University of Washington)
- Monica Ortiz (University of Washington)
- Jonathan Posner (University of Washington)
- Annie Ross (University of Washington)
- Anastasia Schaadhardt (University of Washington)
- Adriana Schultz (University of Washington)
- Anne Turner (University of Washington)
- Megan Hofmann (Carnegie Mellon)
- Scott Hudson (Carnegie Mellon)
- Jim McCann(Carnegie Mellon)
- Aidan Fay (Stanford University)
- Elizabeth Foster (3D Systems Healthcare)
- Benjamin Johnson (3D Systems Healthcare)
- Shelby Marks (3D Systems Healthcare)
- Jacob Ames (Hawk Ridge Systems)
- Brandon Boulden (Hawk Ridge Systems)
- Tristan Butler (Hawk Ridge Systems)
- Mark Dolinar (Hawk Ridge Systems)
- Matthew Fisher (Hawk Ridge Systems)
- Devin Johnson (Hawk Ridge Systems)
- Jack Aubin
- Kavi Dey
- Caitilynn Larmore
- Kelly Richburg
- Sherry Sellentin (Pacific Fabrics and Crafts)
- Kathie Varney (Pacific Fabrics and Crafts)
- Karen Grosh (Pacific Fabrics and Crafts)
Comments
bschenkman
Thu, 2020-04-02 11:06
Permalink
Material
I see the material selected was Nylon. Any feedback on printing this in PLA?
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 16:13
Permalink
Materials
We selected nylon powder bed manufacturing as our initial release due to available information on biocompatibility and disinfection. That information is more difficult to find for other 3D printing materials / methods. At this time, we cannot recommend PLA for this application. However, we would like to release additional guidance on other 3D printing materials and methods. If anyone can provide such info, please reach out to me to expedite this process.
bschenkman
Sun, 2020-04-05 21:27
Permalink
FDM printing
There are some optimizations that could be made to the design to print on FDM more easily, and without supports. A great example are the models coming from La Factoria. Basically, if you design it to print from the nose up on an FDM bed you'll get better results. The way that you have it designed now, it could print on the nose but would need supports. Can you print with supports? Sure. but less to clean up means better fitting snap-together parts.
mirthy
Mon, 2020-04-06 00:13
Permalink
PLA and PETG
Note: I'm a software engineer by trade so take this with a grain of salt. Just doing some research on this as well.
I found this paper on PLA and PETG prints that can be sterlized using low temperature hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterlization.
https://benthamopen.com/FULLTEXT/TODENTJ-13-410#r8
There are some variants of PETG that say in their marketing that they are food safe and biocompatible. I've been printing the NIH face shields in PETG because it's easier to disinfect than PLA.
Any word on using FDM with nylon filament?
dwpemberton
Mon, 2020-04-06 13:15
Permalink
Materials and Printing in Medical Grade PET-G
Chris,
I am working on a design that can be printed on a an FDM printer with the obvious caveats. The materials that you are utilizing for this have to be fairly expensive? It looks like you are using laser sintering of nylon and objet type printers. I believe this could be printed succesfully using PET-G. I have printers that have been custom designed to do orthopedic printing (casts braces etc..). I can print this in a PET-G that ISO 10993 USP Class VI and see how it comes out. There are some features that could be designed better that would allow this design to be printed on an FDM easier. If you would like me to print and evaluate this on my printers please let me know. I can send you the prints. On another note, I am working with the VA Center in Indianapolis on similar type projects.
Thanks,
Dave Pemberton
MedFab3D
317-695-5841
Kris Couvreur
Tue, 2020-04-07 09:45
Permalink
PLA for medical purposes with copper nanoparticles
On this website , one can find a PLA with copper nanoparticles which kills viruses and bacteria and thereby makes these masks reusable :
https://copper3d.com/hackthepandemic
cthai
Tue, 2020-04-07 09:59
Permalink
Hi Chris -
Hi Chris -
I'm aware of 2 biocompatibile and autoclaveable 3D printed material, made by Form Labs: the Surgical Guide resin and the Dental resin: https://dental.formlabs.com/materials/#surgical-guide
They've tested it to ISO 10993 for surface contacting med devices, which have limited contact with the body, e.g. on the skin.
Have you advanced this beyond the clinic and been approved for emergency use by the FDA? I don't have the ability to offer many resources, but I can help with making parts and connecting to the demand regionally (San Diego).
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization#2019-ncov
Info from Formlabs on biocompatibility: https://forum.formlabs.com/t/biocompatibility/24118
CarlaLuzzi
Tue, 2020-04-07 16:16
Permalink
Validation Testing Results
Good afternoon Chris, I hope you and your family are safe. Thank you for ;a; the provided material. Would you happen to have the validation test results of your printed mask from UW?
Thank you.
Matt White
Wed, 2020-04-08 07:58
Permalink
FDM Biocompatibility
Chris,
We would love to start producing this mask with FDM biocompatible materials and we can provide the material/product for testing. Are you able to provide a .stp file for the mask? We may need to make some revisions to avoid support material. Give me a call or email and we can discuss next steps. 484-929-3590 and matt.white@americanadditive.com
amchagas
Wed, 2020-04-08 14:04
Permalink
Hi Chris,
Hi Chris,
maybe worth taking a look at the information Prusa just released about disinfecting their face shields. From what I could gather, they partnered up with different institutions which performed different methods to sanitize their protectors. There is a table with methods and their efficacy https://www.prusa3d.com/covid19/
LT72884
Wed, 2020-04-08 15:24
Permalink
PLA CAN be sterilized using IPA and LOW surface tension liquids
PLA can be sterilized using 70% or higher IPA. The surface tension of IPA is very low, about 23 dynes/cm MEANING that it takes very little energy to break the surface tension allowing the IPA to get into pores smaller than viruses.. How do i knw this, because a friend of mine makes filters that filter viruses out of blood andthey are REQUIRED by LAW to ONLY use IPA 70% or higher. IPA has no issues when sanitizing PLA. I am a Mechancial and materials engineer. This is why you have to soak parts in bleach water for 1 to 2 minutes because the surface tension is 73 dynes/cm.
Even baricide, aka Benzalkonium chloride will work. it has low surface tension, BUT IPA IS BEST!!
LT72884
Wed, 2020-04-08 15:26
Permalink
PLA CAN be sterilized using IPA and LOW surface tension liquids
PLA can be sterilized using 70% or higher IPA. The surface tension of IPA is very low, about 23 dynes/cm MEANING that it takes very little energy to break the surface tension allowing the IPA to get into pores smaller than viruses.. How do i knw this, because a friend of mine makes filters that filter viruses out of blood andthey are REQUIRED by LAW to ONLY use IPA 70% or higher. IPA has no issues when sanitizing PLA. I am a Mechancial and materials engineer. This is why you have to soak parts in bleach water for 1 to 2 minutes because the surface tension is 73 dynes/cm.
Even baricide, aka Benzalkonium chloride will work. it has low surface tension, BUT IPA IS BEST!!
TinCharMan
Wed, 2020-04-08 23:57
Permalink
Paper Bag Trick?
We are reusing N95 filtering facepiece respirators by storing them for extended (4 days) in paper bags. I'm assuming if all we have is PLA/ABS we can use the same technique with these. Thoughts? The universities, tech clubs, etc, have PLA/ABS available now.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hcwcontrols/recommendedguidanceextuse.html
Howard Kaplan
Thu, 2020-04-16 17:03
Permalink
Have you tried SLA surgical
Have you tried SLA surgical materials?
Emanuel Wazar
Sat, 2020-04-18 19:48
Permalink
PLA & FDM not recommend
I understand that FDM printing, and for example PLA plastic, has serious fundamental problems which make it not a disereable process to manufacture PPE respirator face masks. I believe this is due to the porus nature of FDM prints, and how they can have holes in the surface dispite looking like a solid object.
Based on this understanding, I would like to ask is SLA printing any better? Also, would skipping 3d printing entirely and just fabricating these from molds and make solid urethane rubber castsings both safer and economical? There are resins for casting that are certified to be human safe and that have long term high tempature/heat resistance such as use in an autoclave.
My intention is to follow that path towards an improved face mask that is both safe (by meeting safety standards) and easier to mass produce.
Thank you.
Matencio
Tue, 2020-04-28 19:21
Permalink
Resin printing question
I just bought the Elegoo Mars 3D resin printer. Can I make PPE masks for teachers using this? I teach middle school and I'm 60 years old. I really need a dependable mask with replaceable filter, not just for me but for many of the teachers my age that I work with. The resin I use is a water washable type with UV curing. Will this be safe to use? And, because we have to teach children, I'm trying to figure out how to add a microphone so we can be heard. If you know anyone that can help, that would be great. Thanks
Fran Atkins
Thu, 2020-04-02 11:45
Permalink
Instructions
Sorry, I simply cannot find the manufacturing instructions - please point me in the right direction. Also, while waiting does it have to be Nylon?
ChrisAndSamBuild
Sat, 2020-04-04 09:20
Permalink
Hi. You can find instructions
Hi. You can find instructions under the Extras tab, under Supplementatal Documentation. This is for the RevA model https://3dprint.nih.gov/sites/default/files/models/supplemental_documentation/Stopgap%20Face%20Mask%20%28SFM%29%20-%20MJF%20Manufacturing%20Guidance%20for%20-%20Rev%20A_0.pdf
StarHen
Sat, 2020-04-04 13:23
Permalink
Instructions for MJF and SLS
Hi Fran,
There are 2 PDFs linked from the "Extras" tab with printing details. It appears this model is designed for SLS or MJF types of printing, not FDM, which is the type of 3d printing that uses rolls of filament. So I'm not sure that it's suitable for FDM.
mwstevenson
Sat, 2020-04-04 13:49
Permalink
Click on the "Extras" tab -
Click on the "Extras" tab - there are 3 files.
mwstevenson
Sat, 2020-04-04 14:15
Permalink
Click on the "Extras" tab -
Click on the "Extras" tab - there are 3 files.
Fran Atkins
Thu, 2020-04-02 11:59
Permalink
3D Printing
I saw the .stl files, but no instructions for 3D Printing - is this not ready for 3D Printer printing?
eucci
Sat, 2020-04-04 06:51
Permalink
Fran,
Fran,
Instructions can be found in teh "Extras" tab along the left side of the image..
However, this does not appear tp be for FDM printing.
anthony1123
Sat, 2020-04-04 12:05
Permalink
Hi Fran,
Hi Fran,
You can use a program called Ultimaker Cura to take the .stl files and slice them into gcode. Then just load the gcode files onto your printer and you're good to go!
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 16:24
Permalink
Fran, I added this comment to
Fran, I added this comment to the "General information" section: "See the Extras tab for detailed information including the Instructions For Use and Manufacturing Instructions."
ahhlun
Sun, 2020-04-05 05:42
Permalink
Do you have some printer that
Do you have some printer that you can recommend?
aushra
Thu, 2020-04-02 13:46
Permalink
Nylon not compatible with VH2O2 sterilization
Please note that the common hospital practice of sterilization using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VH2O2) may not be compatible with nylon. See, for example, page 13 of this document: https://ww1.steris.com/onbDocs/V440/0/1375474.pdf
bstrzelecki
Fri, 2020-04-03 00:00
Permalink
That is definitely a valid
That is definitely a valid concern, but I haven't noticed any adverse affects when using liquid H2O2 on Nylon. Although it might be differen because it wasn't vaporized. I also can't seem to find the reference on page 13 where is states incompatabilitiy with nylon. However I did see the table on page 19 which highlights that there might be some cosmetic fading even though the functionality won't change much.
Do you happen to have any other references that demonstrate the incompatability of VH2O2, or and forms of hydrogen peroxide for that matter, with Nylon materials? I am interested in learning more about this.
aushra
Sat, 2020-04-04 14:37
Permalink
Sorry, that was the wrong
Sorry, that was the wrong link. See page 13 here: https://ww1.steris.com/onbDocs/V405/1251/664610.pdf It lists four different nylon items that were tested. One failed after the 39th sterilization cycle, two showed fading and one was unaffected. In this report: https://allied-group.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/STERIS-VHP-LTS-V-Technical-Monograph-2016-2.pdf page 5 lists nylon as having "lower" compatibility with H2O2 gas. And here: https://ww1.steris.com/onbDocs/V446/0/1721934.pdf in the footnote to table 21, page 17 it says " Some grades of Nylon, Delrin, and Radel devices may have limited life after repeated sterilization."
I'm not in a position to evaluate the extent to which these concerns apply to the material in this mask and its intended use case. But it may be worth some investigation.
bstrzelecki
Mon, 2020-04-06 00:20
Permalink
This is helpful, thank you.
This is helpful, thank you. It looks like some more physical testing might be in order.
Colinrdodson
Thu, 2020-04-02 14:14
Permalink
Sizing
Hi Chris, Is there a small and large size of this mask available as well or just the medium size?
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 16:28
Permalink
Colinrdodson, I just added a
Colinrdodson, I just added a small size. We hope to add more sizes as we can do more fit testing. Please check this page frequently for updates.
James Ladtkow
Thu, 2020-04-02 15:46
Permalink
filter media
Do you have a suggested filter media? surgical drapes?
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 16:39
Permalink
Filter media
James, we are currently recommending the use of Surgical face masks meeting ASTM F2100−19. One surgical face mask will make approximately four filter patches. Please see Appendix B in the attached Instructions for Use in the Extras tab. We are working hard to find alternate filter materials that do not consume existing medical resources. We don't recommend surgical drapes. Please check this page for updates.
westerj
Wed, 2020-04-08 11:55
Permalink
filter sheet availability - ask any filter mfr
Hi, I asked a filter house about providing sheets of filter material ,Why cut up masks! Here is a MERV13, which might be a little porous, but its an example of asking a vendor to make resources available. Ask em all! https://www.airfiltersdelivered.com/20x36-merv13media-p=P25media
Monsoon Thunder...
Sat, 2020-04-11 03:28
Permalink
Filter Media - possible new ideas
Good evening Chris et al,
I was wandering through the local big orange home improvement company the other day looking for filter media alternatives as our local stores have been out of masks since early February. There are two on-shelf alternatives that I saw at that time, and that trip motivated me to research other available alternative filter options.
Option 1 - shop vacuum filters, including both pleated canisters and vacuum bags, as well as reusable over-filter cover material. I have provided a link for the three different options directly below. Please take a minute to look over the HOPA/ OSHA pleated filter in particular, as it has some interesting specs similar to N95 respirator material.
This first option is built with "HEPA material", and is rated at an equivalent of 0.3 microns+ filtering. As I'm sure you're aware, N95 masks are rated at filtering at least 95% of particles greater than 0.3 microns. Technically, according to the information listed on the website "Enviro safety products" below (and many others I've read), HEPA-certified filters remove +99.97% of material over 0.3 microns, thereby making them "better" than N95m masks at filtering.
HEPA (material) pleated filter. filter bags:
https://images.homedepot-static.com/catalog/pdfImages/67/67e6cc1f-cba4-4fe6-bfe2-18d8c100630b.pdf
Fabric over-filter material (I could not locate filter media density or equivalency on this product, but can inquire with the Mfg. on the same):
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Multi-Fit-Disposable-Dry-Filter-with-Retainer-Band-for-Select-Genie-and-Shop-Vac-Wet-Dry-Vacuums-3-Pack-VF2002/202077243
HEPA/ N95 reference link:
https://www.envirosafetyproducts.com/resources/dust-masks-whats-the-difference.html
Option 2 - HVAC filters. Through my research, the big box stores shelf-stock many different filters that France up to ~MERV 14 =/- (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value). HVAC filters rated at MERV17-MERV20 also filter contaminants above 0.3 microns, the same as a HEPA rating. I have found some different HCAV filters that also purport to be HEPA certified (actual conformity TBD).
MERV-rating reference links:
https://www.serviceexperts.com/indoor-air-quality/remember-to-look-for-the-merv-rating-for-your-air-filter
https://www.grainger.com/know-how/equipment-information/kh-what-is-merv-rating-air-filter-rating-chart'
I am happy to assist however I can, whether it's research, Mfg. contact, design assistance, etc. I look forward to helping out.
Stay safe,
Brandon L.
Monsoon Thunder...
Sat, 2020-04-11 03:38
Permalink
Filter Media - possible new ideas
Good evening Chris et al,
I was wandering through the local big orange home improvement company the other day looking for filter media alternatives as our local stores have been out of masks since early February. There are two on-shelf alternatives that I saw at that time, and that trip motivated me to research other available alternative filter options.
Option 1 - shop vacuum filters, including both pleated canisters and vacuum bags, as well as reusable over-filter cover material. I have provided a link for the three different options directly below. Please take a minute to look over the HOPA/ OSHA pleated filter in particular, as it has some interesting specs similar to N95 respirator material.
This first option is built with "HEPA material", and is rated at an equivalent of 0.3 microns+ filtering. As I'm sure you're aware, N95 masks are rated at filtering at least 95% of particles greater than 0.3 microns. Technically, according to the information listed on the website "Enviro safety products" below (and many others I've read), HEPA-certified filters remove +99.97% of material over 0.3 microns, thereby making them "better" than N95m masks at filtering.
HEPA (material) pleated filter. filter bags:
https://images.homedepot-static.com/catalog/pdfImages/67/67e6cc1f-cba4-4fe6-bfe2-18d8c100630b.pdf
Fabric over-filter material (I could not locate filter media density or equivalency on this product, but can inquire with the Mfg. on the same):
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Multi-Fit-Disposable-Dry-Filter-with-Retainer-Band-for-Select-Genie-and-Shop-Vac-Wet-Dry-Vacuums-3-Pack-VF2002/202077243
HEPA/ N95 reference link:
https://www.envirosafetyproducts.com/resources/dust-masks-whats-the-difference.html
Option 2 - HVAC filters. Through my research, the big box stores shelf-stock many different filters that France up to ~MERV 14 =/- (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value). HVAC filters rated at MERV17-MERV20 also filter contaminants above 0.3 microns, the same as a HEPA rating. I have found some different HCAV filters that also purport to be HEPA certified (actual conformity TBD).
MERV-rating reference links:
https://www.serviceexperts.com/indoor-air-quality/remember-to-look-for-the-merv-rating-for-your-air-filter
https://www.grainger.com/know-how/equipment-information/kh-what-is-merv-rating-air-filter-rating-chart'
Option 3 - prepackaged CPAP filters. I also came across a few different types of CPAP filters. These are not necessarily certified as HEPA-equivalent BUT are typically medically approved (from at least some valid Mfg.) that I have found. I saw many different companies that individually package these filters, which would be a big plus. Additionally, the filters are generally cut into fairly common shapes/ sizes. These filters, as I have learned, work to filter the intake air side of the CPAP machines, thereby directly filtering the air that the end-user is breathing.
I am happy to assist however I can, whether it's research, Mfg. contact, design assistance, etc. I look forward to helping out.
Stay safe,
Brandon L.
Ross Kayuha
Wed, 2020-04-15 12:59
Permalink
Filter Media
My company can produce approximately 100,000 filters for this type of mask - approximate size 2.5x2.5 inches. They have been tested to meet the N95 standard. Please let me know if you are interested. ross.kayuha@nanofibersolutions.com
Lt Col Jay Vizcarra
Fri, 2020-04-03 00:34
Permalink
Seal test
Any qualitative or quantitative fit test accomplished on the mask?
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 16:45
Permalink
Fit test
Lt Col Jay Vizcarra, yes, we have conducted qualitative fit testing with over 50 clinicians. We are reviewing that data to see which sizes and shapes we should add. That testing led us to add a small size in addition to the medium. We feel the qualitative fit testing is sufficient to meet the requirements of a surgical face mask.
andywellis
Fri, 2020-04-10 14:35
Permalink
Fit testing
I have performed quantitative testing with this design (Portacount Pro+) and many others. This Stopgap Masks out performed a surgical mask and cloth face coverings, but all were WELL below the standard for an N95 respirator. We have had increased fit factor numbers in limited tests with various seal materials added to periphery. Dental lab putty has been most effective. HEPA filter performed slightly better than blue intrument wrap (3-ply polyprolene) but we have more of teh polyprolene and it seems more resistant to tearing.
James Macanufo
Fri, 2020-04-03 20:58
Permalink
Gasket and filter materials needed
1. Is gasket material recommended for fit against face? If so please include in build instructions and BOM
2. Filter material also needed. Please advise.
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 16:51
Permalink
Gasket and filter materials
James, for filter media, please see the Extras tab, Instructions for Use, Appendix B. We are not recommending additional gasket material for sealing against the face to keep the design as simple as possible. This is similar to existing surgical face masks that do not achieve a perfect seal against the face.
James Macanufo
Fri, 2020-04-03 23:53
Permalink
Design rec
This would be more reliably printed if the face was flat. Consider putting the insert in the back of the mask.
Chris Richburg
Sat, 2020-04-04 17:00
Permalink
design revision
James, I don't understand your suggestion. Can you contact me directly by logging in, click my name, then contact?
bschenkman
Sun, 2020-04-05 21:30
Permalink
FDM considerations
This is about FDM printers, I noted in a previous comment. Having the main part of the mask's "nose" totally flat makes it easier to print without support (or at all) on an FDM printer).
dewritten
Mon, 2020-04-06 10:04
Permalink
Fused Filament Fabrication
Chris,
I believe what James is referring to is the fact that many consumer 3D printers use a flat build surface and then lay down layers of material on top of each other to build parts.
In order for these printers to be effective they need to print from a flat surface.
I would like to be able to print this in PLA on a printer that uses the above method.
Here is some info on biocompatibility of PLA: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X16300989
I have a question regarding the design: Is it important for the mask to be printed from a flexible material? I know that it is vital to get a good seal between the face and the mask. I have never worked with powdered nylon prints and do not know how rigid they are.
Will Kellogg
Tue, 2020-04-07 16:09
Permalink
+1 for flush front design revision
I agree with this design revision idea, It would make it much easier for FDM printers to print if the front face was flat. If you were to cut out the section that you snap the cover onto, and flip it 180, so that the flat part (currently facing in towards the face) would face out. Then the filter insert would be on the inside of the mask and you would have a flush bottom to print from. You might have to tweak the filter insert and cap to not be rubbing up against the mouth. Possibly making it thinner etc.
DeudeMann
Thu, 2020-04-09 18:27
Permalink
FDM oriented design
Chris first thanks for sharing this. What the others said about the FDM printability is correct. HOWEVER if I could get the STEP file I think it would only take a simple modification to the front of the mask to make it printable via FDM. I do not think it needs to be completely flat so I could make the design work with the front mount filter retainer.
I am very interested in producing these on my FDM printer and would be happy to make the change. I just cannot do it with STL or X3D files.
babblefish
Fri, 2020-04-10 03:43
Permalink
I've done a remix of the mask
I've done a remix of the mask to make it FDM printer friendly but I don't know how to get it up on this site. When I try to publish it as a remix, it won't let me upload the .STL file. Tells me it's an unvalid file type.
I moved the cover retaining ring from the front of the mask to the inside so that the mask has a flat surface to sit on the build plate. The filter cover fits inside the mask instead of outside. Not sure if it'll clear a wearers nose though since I haven't printed it out yet. I also changed the shape of the elastic cord tabs so that they will print without supports.
Pages